What do you think, real or my imagination??

I see a horned figure expelling flames, not sure anyone else does.

I see two faces top left, the crystalline structure of the material induces pareidolia, if I saw the whole item I may be able to see recognized motifs in worked edges, this would indicate whether it is likely to be an artifact or not. Prehistoric people took advantage of such inclusions and structures, but such images would be completely ambiguous without triggering details, and to myself imagined unless grounded by known figuration and workmanship to detail the figuration.

Seems like your viewing art through the lens of science, not sure that really works. I thinks it’s intentional, but understand why’ you don’t.

Yes, in a way, I have to establish workmanship to start with, due to the mainstream ignorance to this type of art. In the stone below you may notice three images stacked one upon another, ape-like face profile (left facing) whole elephant (right facing) and tortoise (left facing) I steer clear of describing images like this on my blog, for a number of reasons, although in this case i am sure these images are art, as 1. they are all upright, when the stone is in its standing position 2. I have seen all three before, 3. The stone is worked and is a tool. I am pretty sure the hair line cracks which define the images is from some kind of workmanship, I just don't know what that kind of workmanship is, and its all  a bit of a mess really. The cracks that define the shape you describe could have been made by the same technique.

Notice the same hairline cracks describe a circle which is centralized along the longest axis, and also a symmetrical grey patch below.

I don’t think you will get anywhere playing by the rules put in place by the establishment. If you are worried about convention I don't think you will convince many, but just my opinion. You won’t win playing by their rules.

They can't beat science, they will be forced to concede, the game is up, the museums and 'experts' will either cautiously accept figure stones with enough evidence of modification and detail or they will become a laughing stock, and a Pollitition will sack their ass's.

Lol. You funny.

Maybe it is a bit of wishful thinking, but something has to give sooner of later.

I too see the two images on the top left.
As Brett said the matrix induces paradolia. The horned image I have seen before .
Very similar image to a stone I have. I will have to dig it out and will compare.
I have just had another look at the image and it is spookily similar to the stone I have I will find it today

I’d love to see it if you can.

Apologies

Facing opposite to your image.

Opps two many pictures

Looks like a coprolite.

Last Stone: The face in the middle is rather non-descriptive, to the right we have some feline like resemblances though and upwards we have a very subtle mamoth like description.

I just saw the pics that’s a cool one baggy

A piece of cabbage.
Lol